Score : 5/10
Year : 1952
Country: USA
Language: English
Duration: 1h46
For a change, I kinda preferred
the french title for this movie (torn mask), as the original, Sudden fear,
doesn't fully suit the movie. It's based on an eponymous novel by Edna Sherry,
which I haven't read, so I cannot attest to adaptation quality ; I found this
movie entertaining, with potential, but lacking in some respects.
The story's simple enough : Lester Blaine is am ambitious actor,
who insinuates himself into the life of a middle-aged playwright, with a
plot to her wealth.
The movie did have potential, and
for its time, isn't all that bad ; I didn't anticipate a mind-boggling story,
and found the overall acting to be good, especially by Palance and
Crawford most convincing in the cast. They both portrayed their respective
roles well, with good body language and facial expressions - Crawford is quite
good at this part.
There were a few predictable
parts, but also red herrings.
There were a few hints to open
the viewer's interpretation to other possible background stories.
Cinematography was ok, even
creative at times, but doesn't stand out nor shines with special views - though
I cannot attest to proper appearance, as I watched this on a dvd from the
library.
There were a few issues :
Elmer Bernseing's music was
abysmal. Sound was a huge problem, alternating between muttered phrases, and
really loud sounds, such as of trains and shouts.
Dialogues were limited to set the
plot, but not to build characters.
Some dubious artistic and directorial
choices, including repetitious echoes a character hears ; a disc stuck at its
end far too long before it is stopped, and imagined scenarios. These all give
the distinct impression they are fillers.
Writer shows lack of knowledge of
women's habits.
Sudden fear's ending wasn't very
predictable, as hints to it occur only just before it happens ; in this
respect, the movie shifted away from totally expected plots. It doesn't really
innovate, but maybe for its time stood out a bit more.
Despite its issues, it was
entertaining ; because of them, however, I don't plan watching it again. Hence
the medium score of 5/10 : it had potential, the things that worked, worked
really well, and the parts that didn't work, didn't work at all.
Cast:
Comments
Post a Comment